9/11? Demolition. Obviously so. Now drink the fucking Kool-ade and shut the fuck up, you crazies, you conspiracy nuts, you freaks with tin-foil on your head who’d rather believe your own eyes, your own thinking, and physics than us, your government.
It all just magically did what no other building ever did for any reason whatsoever. Oh, wait. THREE buildings did it. Not to mention the amazing disappearing plane and body parts that made a tiny hole in Somerset, PA or in the Pentagon, which exploded OUTward before being struck by a cruise missile. If there were a 757 there it flew over and continued on, but hey: Ignore those lamp posts.
Cite a building that collapsed into its own footprint without being demolished. You can’t. There are none. Not even high rises on fire for days. None. Ever. And Building seven was not hit by a plane and if there were fires they were in wastebaskets and so forth.
No plane hit Bldg 7. None. Nada. So, no. It was pulled, as Larry Silverstein admitted on camera. He decided to. The story of small, scattered fires the fire chief himself on the scene dismissed as easily put down by one team of firefighters so weakening a building that it fell is ludicrous.
Now take a 757 full of passengers at as fast a speed as possible and fly it directly down into a field. What do you think is going to happen? Do you think a tiny hole 20′ x 10′ is going to be made? Do you honestly believe the plane, its engines, its tail section, all of it, along with every trace of the passengers all “vaporized”? No, it would make a crater, and the resultant explosion just from kinetic energy alone, let alone fuel igniting, would spew body parts and debris over a tremendous area. Think of a meteorite. None of that happened. None of that was found.
Satellite photographs from Google Earth from a couple weeks before 9/11 show the farmer digging that hole with a small bull dozer or back-hoe that was still parked there on the fateful day when lies fell from the sky. He admitted as much. Said he’d dug it to burn brush he’d cleared to expand a nearby field for tilling.
Alleged cell-phone calls from the plane in the days when it was not physically possible to make cell phone calls from planes, there being no satellite coverage, only a string of towers for the signals to reach if the plane were low enough, were offered by the government. Obvious fakes, but why? And where did those people on the planes go?
Cleveland’s airport was evacuated, the people being forced to leave on foot. Many reported seeing a plane land and taxi to the end of the runway where a large white hangar operated, turns out, by NASA, stood. Witnesses saw the plane’s passengers unloaded into this hangar. None were ever heard from again. The plane itself it still in service flying the South America routes, it is later discovered.
Were the passengers herded into the hangar and forced to make fake recordings? Were they then taken to some deniable place like Area 51 or some GITMO dark prison or black ship to become shark chum? Just asking, don’t mind me.
The physical evidence does not agree with the absurd, conspiratorial official version. 9/11 remains unexplained to this day.
Google some citations for us of buildings falling down spontaneously into their own footprint. Go ahead, show us the citations. You will discover there are none.
No one argues planes did not hit the twin towers. However, no plane hit building seven. As to the Pentagon, that was a cruise missile. It was not a 757. Eye witness testimony contradicts physics all the time. Every forensic scientist and lawyer knows this.
Planes hit the twin towers it seems. That did not bring the buildings down. Cheney prevented interception of the jets yes. As a Senator testified.
Was thermate, a stable form of thermite, painted onto the support beams in the weeks leading up to the Bush brother resigning a day before 9/11? Oopsie. Guess he didn’t want to go down with his plot.
So the buildings came down, yes, but is a plane impact sufficient to cause this, let alone pulverize the entire structure to concrete dust while paper was not burned? The paper was exploded out is why, perhaps.
I’ve no clue whom 9/11 would be traced to, but it’s obvious who benefited from it. Dicks Like Cheney. As to conspiracy, it would not take much of one to pull it off under everyone’s noses. People ridicule conspiracy as if doing covert things requires huge numbers of people to be in on it, when in fact one or two people misdirecting certain things can cause or allow to happen a range of useful disasters to be exploited by the 1% types. Naomi Wolfe I think it was wrote about Disaster Capitalism, and it was nothing new but the label, really.
The fact that such a huge, historical crime scene was clamped down and cleared away as fast as possible is a tell-tale. They did NOT want pools of thermate found, they did NOT want the physical evidence examined.
Those who deny conspiracies ever happen obviously made LOTS of money in the Wall Street bankster conspiracies and the housing bubble and energy scam and so on. Or they are duped by those who did. Psychology’s tricky and people easily fooled.
Apply my methods, Watson.
The official version contradicts experience, logic, and physics. Talk about an probable conspiracy theory. Yes, unsophisticated ragheads with box cutters and no connections accomplished what Mossad would be hard-pressed to do. Right. Sure.
To be clear, while I suspect Dicks Like Cheney were behind this, I do not know who planned and executed it. It may have been allowed to happen or it may have been an internal plot or a bit of both. No one knows. The evidence is lied about and the crime scene was quickly destroyed. Even asking basic questions of physics gets you immediately swarmed by defenders of the official version and labeled a Truther, as if seeking the truth makes one crazy but blindly swallowing a version that makes no sense is the only acceptable behavior allowed. What’s all that tell you? Tells me a lot of people work very hard to lock in a story while fending off genuine investigation. That alone is indicative.
Read history. False flag operations are standard procedure, as are coverups, obfuscation, and sneering denials, along with demonizing questions and bullying a conformity to one official version. It’s all standard.
Warren Commission behavior, in short. Remember when Oliver Stone’s film JFK came out, how crazy the right wingers went over what was after all only a movie? Recall too how frenzied the Vatican became over The Da Vinci Code, an obviously fictional entertainment. All that had to happen in either case was silence and the movies would have passed by as mere movies. Instead, guilt and shame and paranoia stirred up very revealing denials and demonizing that no innocent party would ever have thought to bother with. Again, revealing. See the obvious folks.
/// /// ///
